From: Jiri Benc <jbenc@redhat.com>
To: Ronen Arad <ronen.arad@intel.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/4] rtnetlink: Add get_link_af_size_filtered to rtnl_af_ops
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 11:55:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151014115518.071a3996@griffin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1444802314-28830-2-git-send-email-ronen.arad@intel.com>
On Tue, 13 Oct 2015 22:58:31 -0700, Ronen Arad wrote:
> --- a/include/net/rtnetlink.h
> +++ b/include/net/rtnetlink.h
> @@ -130,6 +130,8 @@ struct rtnl_af_ops {
> const struct nlattr *attr);
> int (*set_link_af)(struct net_device *dev,
> const struct nlattr *attr);
> + size_t (*get_link_af_size_filtered)(const struct net_device *dev,
> + u32 ext_filter_mask);
> };
There's not much point in having two callbacks doing essentially the
same. Why you just don't add the new parameter to the existing
get_link_af_size? Looking at what the patch 3 does, the current
implementations of the callback can just ignore the new parameter and
bridge can remove the current br_get_link_af and rename
br_get_link_af_size_filtered to br_get_link_af.
Jiri
--
Jiri Benc
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-14 9:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-14 5:58 [PATCH net-next 0/4] Rightsize IFLA_AF_SPEC size calculation Ronen Arad
2015-10-14 5:58 ` [PATCH net-next 1/4] rtnetlink: Add get_link_af_size_filtered to rtnl_af_ops Ronen Arad
2015-10-14 9:55 ` Jiri Benc [this message]
2015-10-14 14:46 ` Arad, Ronen
2015-10-14 5:58 ` [PATCH net-next 2/4] bridge: br_af_ops add br_get_link_af_size_filtered Ronen Arad
2015-10-14 5:58 ` [PATCH net-next 3/4] rtnetlink: Prefer filtering-aware af sizing Ronen Arad
2015-10-14 5:58 ` [PATCH net-next 4/4] bridge: Remove br_get_link_af_size Ronen Arad
2015-10-14 15:51 ` [PATCH net-next v2] netlink: Rightsize IFLA_AF_SPEC size calculation Ronen Arad
2015-10-15 2:24 ` David Miller
2015-10-15 5:52 ` Arad, Ronen
2015-10-15 5:50 ` [PATCH net-next v3] " Ronen Arad
2015-10-15 13:02 ` David Miller
2015-10-19 16:23 ` Ronen Arad
2015-10-21 6:31 ` Samudrala, Sridhar
2015-10-22 2:15 ` David Miller
2015-10-15 1:44 ` [PATCH net-next 0/4] " David Miller
2015-10-15 1:32 ` Arad, Ronen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151014115518.071a3996@griffin \
--to=jbenc@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ronen.arad@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).