From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jiri Pirko Subject: Re: [patch net-next v5 3/8] switchdev: allow caller to explicitly request attr_set as deferred Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 07:57:53 +0200 Message-ID: <20151015055753.GA2242@nanopsycho.orion> References: <1444844455-12508-1-git-send-email-jiri@resnulli.us> <1444844455-12508-4-git-send-email-jiri@resnulli.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Netdev , "David S. Miller" , Ido Schimmel , Elad Raz , Florian Fainelli , Guenter Roeck , Vivien Didelot , "andrew@lunn.ch" , john fastabend , David Laight , "stephen@networkplumber.org" To: Scott Feldman Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f173.google.com ([209.85.212.173]:33964 "EHLO mail-wi0-f173.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753613AbbJOF54 (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Oct 2015 01:57:56 -0400 Received: by wicgb1 with SMTP id gb1so12469402wic.1 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 22:57:55 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 06:34:01AM CEST, sfeldma@gmail.com wrote: >On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote: >> From: Jiri Pirko >> >> Caller should know if he can call attr_set directly (when holding RTNL) >> or if he has to defer the att_set processing for later. >> >> This also allows drivers to sleep inside attr_set and report operation >> status back to switchdev core. Switchdev core then warns if status is >> not ok, instead of silent errors happening in drivers. >> >> Benefit from newly introduced switchdev deferred ops infrastructure. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko >> --- >> include/net/switchdev.h | 1 + >> net/bridge/br_stp.c | 3 +- >> net/switchdev/switchdev.c | 108 ++++++++++++++++++---------------------------- >> 3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/include/net/switchdev.h b/include/net/switchdev.h >> index d1c7f90..f7de6f8 100644 >> --- a/include/net/switchdev.h >> +++ b/include/net/switchdev.h >> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ >> >> #define SWITCHDEV_F_NO_RECURSE BIT(0) >> #define SWITCHDEV_F_SKIP_EOPNOTSUPP BIT(1) >> +#define SWITCHDEV_F_DEFER BIT(2) >> >> struct switchdev_trans_item { >> struct list_head list; >> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_stp.c b/net/bridge/br_stp.c >> index db6d243de..80c34d7 100644 >> --- a/net/bridge/br_stp.c >> +++ b/net/bridge/br_stp.c >> @@ -41,13 +41,14 @@ void br_set_state(struct net_bridge_port *p, unsigned int state) >> { >> struct switchdev_attr attr = { >> .id = SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_STP_STATE, >> + .flags = SWITCHDEV_F_DEFER, >> .u.stp_state = state, >> }; >> int err; >> >> p->state = state; >> err = switchdev_port_attr_set(p->dev, &attr); >> - if (err && err != -EOPNOTSUPP) >> + if (err) >> br_warn(p->br, "error setting offload STP state on port %u(%s)\n", >> (unsigned int) p->port_no, p->dev->name); >> } > >Should this part of the patch be moved to patch 6/8 where >switchdev_deferred_process() is called from del_nbp()? No, this part relates to the fact that attr_set now does not defer automagically. So caller must say when to defer. So having this here is correct.