netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Ani Sinha <ani@arista.com>
Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netfilter@vger.kernel.org,
	coreteam@netfilter.org,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux 3.4.43 : kernel crash at __nf_conntrack_confirm
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 10:07:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151018080702.GA14564@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOxq_8Pt7VMwkV8+wdjS9vj=-L0L8Xxkd3Beit0zZN_oR6ixhw@mail.gmail.com>

Ani Sinha <ani@arista.com> wrote:
> Coming back to this crash, I see something interesting in the
> conntrack code in linux 3.4.109 (a supported kernel version). I see
> that the hash table manipulations are protected by a spinlock. Also
> lookups/reads are protected by RCU. However allocation and
> deallocation of conntrack objects happen outside of both the locks.
> It seems to me that a conntrack object can be deallocated and a new
> object can be allocated and initialized within the same RCU grace
> period, while the hash table is being read.

Yes.  We need to use SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU instead of kfree_rcu because
there could be hundreds of thousands of alloc/free pairs within a short
time period.

> It looks like a bug to me.

No, as long as readers detect object reuse.

> > Looking upstream, I see a couple of patches which fixes race condition
> > around the use of the conntrack hash table with RCU (lock free read)
> > primitives :
> >
> > commit c6825c0976fa7893692e0e43b09740b419b23c09
> > Author: Andrey Vagin <avagin@openvz.org>
> > Date:   Wed Jan 29 19:34:14 2014 +0100
> >      netfilter: nf_conntrack: fix RCU race in nf_conntrack_find_get
> >
> > and a followup patch :
> >
> > commit e53376bef2cd97d3e3f61fdc677fb8da7d03d0da
> > Author: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
> > Date:   Mon Feb 3 20:01:53 2014 +0100
> >         netfilter: nf_conntrack: don't release a conntrack with non-zero refcnt
> >

These for instance fix such bugs.

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-18  8:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-07 19:57 linux 3.4.43 : kernel crash at __nf_conntrack_confirm Ani Sinha
2015-10-18  2:34 ` Ani Sinha
2015-10-18  8:07   ` Florian Westphal [this message]
     [not found]     ` <CAOxq_8NLLFyNCSDJ68+VjxFGpNSex8ShdhGFNBHK29g_+UBW6g@mail.gmail.com>
2015-10-18 21:12       ` Ani Sinha
2015-10-18 21:40         ` Florian Westphal
2015-10-19 20:22           ` Ani Sinha
2015-10-19 20:33             ` Florian Westphal
2015-10-19 22:13               ` Ani Sinha
2015-10-21 19:35     ` Ani Sinha
2015-10-21 21:19       ` Florian Westphal
2015-10-21 21:26         ` Ani Sinha

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151018080702.GA14564@breakpoint.cc \
    --to=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=ani@arista.com \
    --cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).