netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Shewmaker <agshew@gmail.com>
To: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/7] tcp: track min RTT using windowed min-filter
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 21:39:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151019043907.GA11368@mininet-vm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151014092800.GA3748@mininet-vm>

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 02:28:00AM -0700, Andrew Shewmaker wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 09:57:42PM -0700, Yuchung Cheng wrote:
> ...
> > diff --git a/include/linux/tcp.h b/include/linux/tcp.h
> > index 86a7eda..90edef5 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/tcp.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/tcp.h
> > @@ -217,6 +217,9 @@ struct tcp_sock {
> >  	u32	mdev_max_us;	/* maximal mdev for the last rtt period	*/
> >  	u32	rttvar_us;	/* smoothed mdev_max			*/
> >  	u32	rtt_seq;	/* sequence number to update rttvar	*/
> > +	struct rtt_meas {
> > +		u32 rtt, ts;	/* RTT in usec and sampling time in jiffies. */
> > +	} rtt_min[3];
> 
> First, thanks for all the work in this patch series. In particular,
> applying Kern's check to ca_seq_rtt_us should fix some bad behavior
> I've observed recently.

I'd have to run more tests to be sure, but net-next with this patch series
significantly improves upon the poor behavior I was seeing where randomly
dropped packets greatly limited the usefulness of RTTs as a signal of
congestion. I still see some measurements that exceed the amount of delay
possible from queue buildup, but fewer than before.

Thanks!

-Andrew

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-10-19  4:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-17  4:57 [PATCH net-next 0/7] RACK loss detection Yuchung Cheng
2015-10-17  4:57 ` [PATCH net-next 1/7] tcp: apply Kern's check on RTTs used for congestion control Yuchung Cheng
2016-02-02 19:30   ` Kenneth Klette Jonassen
2016-02-02 23:28     ` Yuchung Cheng
2015-10-17  4:57 ` [PATCH net-next 2/7] tcp: track min RTT using windowed min-filter Yuchung Cheng
2015-10-14  9:28   ` Andrew Shewmaker
2015-10-18 14:33     ` Neal Cardwell
2015-10-14 13:25       ` Andrew Shewmaker
2015-10-19  4:39     ` Andrew Shewmaker [this message]
2015-10-17  4:57 ` [PATCH net-next 3/7] tcp: remove tcp_mark_lost_retrans() Yuchung Cheng
2015-10-17  4:57 ` [PATCH net-next 4/7] tcp: add tcp_tsopt_ecr_before helper Yuchung Cheng
2015-10-17  4:57 ` [PATCH net-next 5/7] tcp: skb_mstamp_after helper Yuchung Cheng
2015-10-17  4:57 ` [PATCH net-next 6/7] tcp: track the packet timings in RACK Yuchung Cheng
2015-10-17  4:57 ` [PATCH net-next 7/7] tcp: use RACK to detect losses Yuchung Cheng
2015-10-21 14:01 ` [PATCH net-next 0/7] RACK loss detection David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151019043907.GA11368@mininet-vm \
    --to=agshew@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=ncardwell@google.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ycheng@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).