From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Graf Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 net 2/3] openvswitch: Treat IP_CT_RELATED as new Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 02:25:42 +0200 Message-ID: <20151020002542.GD7104@pox.localdomain> References: <1445018901-18839-1-git-send-email-joestringer@nicira.com> <1445018901-18839-3-git-send-email-joestringer@nicira.com> <20151017075233.GC13981@pox.localdomain> <20151019090332.GA7104@pox.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Linux Netdev List , Pravin Shelar , Jarno Rajahalme To: Joe Stringer Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f175.google.com ([209.85.212.175]:33814 "EHLO mail-wi0-f175.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751448AbbJTAZp (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Oct 2015 20:25:45 -0400 Received: by wikq8 with SMTP id q8so22416359wik.1 for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 17:25:43 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 10/19/15 at 04:13pm, Joe Stringer wrote: > I think that the proper solution instead of this patch is to set NEW > if !nf_ct_is_confirmed(ct). This is more accurately the meaning for > 'NEW' that we are actually trying to expose. As long as this is done > before confirming the connection during a "commit", this will make the > behaviour consistent with the lack of commit flag. I'm sending a > patch. Thanks for the feedback! Agreed. This sounds perfect.