From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Graf Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [RFC PATCH 1/5] netfilter: Remove IP_CT_NEW_REPLY definition. Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 01:32:11 +0200 Message-ID: <20151021233211.GF23554@pox.localdomain> References: <1445379629-112880-1-git-send-email-jrajahalme@nicira.com> <20151021083323.GB15539@pox.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev , dev@openvswitch.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Jarno Rajahalme Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On 10/21/15 at 01:15pm, Jarno Rajahalme wrote: > > > On Oct 21, 2015, at 1:33 AM, Thomas Graf wrote: > > I understand what you are doing here but this is part of the published > > UAPI and removing this might break compilation of a user application > > even if the definition is not used right now. It's probably safer to > > leave the definition and obsolete it with a comment. > > OK. I should probably separate the netlink and openvswitch changes to separate patches as well? Given that at that point the changes become unrelated, I'd split it into separate patches, yes.