From: Jiri Benc <jbenc@redhat.com>
To: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>
Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, thaller@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: try harder to not reuse ifindex when moving interfaces
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 17:00:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151022170100.1e45a8b8@griffin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5628F81D.1070009@6wind.com>
On Thu, 22 Oct 2015 16:52:13 +0200, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
> With the proposed scenario:
> 1. create netns 'new_netns'
> 2. in root netns, move the interface with ifindex 2 to new_netns
> 3. in new_netns, delete the interface with ifindex 2
> 4. in new_netns, create an interface - it will get ifindex 2
>
> Operation 2 and 4 are done by dev_change_net_namespace() under rtnl_lock().
> RTM_DELLINK(root netns) and RTM_NEWLINK(new_netns) are sent by this function.
> It means that operation 3 has been done before and that RTM_DELLINK(new_netns)
> has been sent before.
Imagine the application trying to configure the interface with ifindex 2
after your step 2. It constructs a netlink message and sends it to the
kernel; but while doing so, steps 3 and 4 happen. Now the application
ends up configuring a different interface than it intended to. After
that, it polls the netlink socket and receives the notifications about
interface disappearing and a new one appearing.
I don't see any way the user space application can prevent this. There
will always be a race between receiving netlink notifications and
sending config requests.
I guess Thomas Haller can elaborate more as he ran into this.
Jiri
--
Jiri Benc
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-22 15:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-16 11:07 [PATCH net] net: try harder to not reuse ifindex when moving interfaces Jiri Benc
2015-10-18 15:11 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-10-19 9:06 ` Jiri Benc
2015-10-19 15:36 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-10-21 14:43 ` David Miller
2015-10-21 14:46 ` Jiri Benc
2015-10-21 15:32 ` David Miller
2015-10-21 15:25 ` Jiri Benc
2015-10-21 15:56 ` David Miller
2015-10-21 17:12 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2015-10-22 14:52 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2015-10-22 15:00 ` Jiri Benc [this message]
2015-10-22 15:10 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2015-10-22 15:20 ` Thomas Haller
2015-10-22 15:23 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2015-10-22 16:45 ` Thomas Graf
2015-10-22 17:21 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2015-10-22 18:56 ` Thomas Graf
2015-10-23 10:40 ` Thomas Haller
2015-10-22 15:21 ` Thomas Haller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151022170100.1e45a8b8@griffin \
--to=jbenc@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com \
--cc=thaller@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).