From: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Jon Paul Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@01.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com>,
tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [net-next:master 1605/1613] net/tipc/link.c:166:6: sparse: symbol 'link_is_bc_sndlink' was not declared. Should it be static?
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 22:56:00 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201510242238.2cwVlzRz%fengguang.wu@intel.com> (raw)
tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next.git master
head: 687f079addba1ac7f97ce97080c2291bbe8c8dce
commit: 5266698661401afc5e4a1a521cf9ba10724d10dd [1605/1613] tipc: let broadcast packet reception use new link receive function
reproduce:
# apt-get install sparse
git checkout 5266698661401afc5e4a1a521cf9ba10724d10dd
make ARCH=x86_64 allmodconfig
make C=1 CF=-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__
sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>> net/tipc/link.c:166:6: sparse: symbol 'link_is_bc_sndlink' was not declared. Should it be static?
>> net/tipc/link.c:171:6: sparse: symbol 'link_is_bc_rcvlink' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/tipc/link.c:635:6: sparse: symbol 'link_prepare_wakeup' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/tipc/link.c:891:6: sparse: symbol 'tipc_link_advance_backlog' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/tipc/link.c:967:5: sparse: symbol 'tipc_link_retrans' was not declared. Should it be static?
>> net/tipc/link.c:1561:6: sparse: symbol 'tipc_link_build_bc_init_msg' was not declared. Should it be static?
include/linux/rcupdate.h:305:9: sparse: context imbalance in 'tipc_link_find_owner' - wrong count at exit
net/tipc/link.c:1821:5: sparse: context imbalance in 'tipc_nl_link_set' - different lock contexts for basic block
net/tipc/link.c:2058:5: sparse: context imbalance in 'tipc_nl_link_dump' - different lock contexts for basic block
net/tipc/link.c:2129:5: sparse: context imbalance in 'tipc_nl_link_get' - different lock contexts for basic block
net/tipc/link.c:2181:5: sparse: context imbalance in 'tipc_nl_link_reset_stats' - different lock contexts for basic block
--
net/tipc/node.c:144:18: sparse: symbol 'tipc_node_create' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/tipc/node.c:831:6: sparse: symbol 'tipc_node_filter_pkt' was not declared. Should it be static?
>> net/tipc/node.c:1090:6: sparse: symbol 'tipc_node_bc_rcv' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/tipc/node.c:237:5: sparse: context imbalance in 'tipc_node_add_conn' - different lock contexts for basic block
net/tipc/node.c:268:6: sparse: context imbalance in 'tipc_node_remove_conn' - different lock contexts for basic block
net/tipc/node.c:303:9: sparse: context imbalance in 'tipc_node_timeout' - different lock contexts for basic block
net/tipc/node.c:383:13: sparse: context imbalance in 'tipc_node_link_up' - wrong count at exit
net/tipc/node.c:463:13: sparse: context imbalance in 'tipc_node_link_down' - wrong count at exit
net/tipc/node.c:497:6: sparse: context imbalance in 'tipc_node_check_dest' - wrong count at exit
net/tipc/node.c:917:9: sparse: context imbalance in 'tipc_node_get_linkname' - different lock contexts for basic block
net/tipc/node.c:935:9: sparse: context imbalance in 'tipc_node_unlock' - unexpected unlock
net/tipc/node.c:1027:5: sparse: context imbalance in 'tipc_node_xmit' - wrong count at exit
>> net/tipc/node.c:1090:6: sparse: context imbalance in 'tipc_node_bc_rcv' - wrong count at exit
net/tipc/node.c:1277:6: sparse: context imbalance in 'tipc_rcv' - different lock contexts for basic block
net/tipc/node.c:1348:5: sparse: context imbalance in 'tipc_nl_node_dump' - different lock contexts for basic block
Please review and possibly fold the followup patch.
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
next reply other threads:[~2015-10-24 14:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-24 14:56 kbuild test robot [this message]
2015-10-24 14:56 ` [RFC PATCH net-next] tipc: link_is_bc_sndlink() can be static kbuild test robot
2015-10-24 18:50 ` Jon Maloy
2015-10-25 13:34 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201510242238.2cwVlzRz%fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=jon.maloy@ericsson.com \
--cc=kbuild-all@01.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=ying.xue@windriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox