From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] mpls: support for dead routes Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2015 23:37:18 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <20151102.233718.457762701709770369.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1446498529-50275-1-git-send-email-roopa@cumulusnetworks.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ebiederm@xmission.com, rshearma@brocade.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: roopa@cumulusnetworks.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:39507 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750716AbbKCEhU (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Nov 2015 23:37:20 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1446498529-50275-1-git-send-email-roopa@cumulusnetworks.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Roopa Prabhu Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 13:08:49 -0800 > + if ((nh->nh_flags & RTNH_F_DEAD) || > + (nh->nh_flags & RTNH_F_LINKDOWN)) > + continue; A single "& (RTNH_F_DEAD | RTNH_F_LINKDOWN)" is more efficient and more canonical. > + if ((nh->nh_flags & RTNH_F_LINKDOWN) || > + (nh->nh_flags & RTNH_F_DEAD)) > + rt->rt_nhn_alive--; Likewise.