From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: William Dauchy Subject: Re: dynamically set number of queues for 82598 devices Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 10:56:03 +0100 Message-ID: <20151103095603.GE7714@gandi.net> References: <20151029152645.GD7657@gandi.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9l24NVCWtSuIVIod" Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Tal Abudi , Emil Tantilov , Jeff Kirsher , william@gandi.net To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail4.gandi.net ([217.70.183.210]:59082 "EHLO gandi.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751289AbbKCJ4H (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Nov 2015 04:56:07 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151029152645.GD7657@gandi.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --9l24NVCWtSuIVIod Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello David, On Oct29 16:26, William Dauchy wrote: > I faced the problem described in commit 7e3f5c8: > ixgbe: fix bounds checking in ixgbe_setup_tc for 82598 >=20 > This patch resolves an issue where users were not able to dynamically > set number of queues for 82598 via ethtool -L >=20 > I backported it for my v4.1.x build but I was wondering if this could be > a candidate for a backport in stable tree at least for v4.1.x. Since we are now in a bug fix period, I was wondering if you could have a look at commit 7e3f5c8 (ixgbe: fix bounds checking in ixgbe_setup_tc for 82598) I don't see it in http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/bundle/davem/stable/?state=3D* so I was wondering if it could be a valid candidate for stable. Best regards, --=20 William --9l24NVCWtSuIVIod Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlY4hLMACgkQ1I6eqOUidQEYigCgjIHYW8Fl/qHBsMwi9m/lOsnR AbcAmwSmSxmOuZ/0Dag2I1/Pm6m8sAJT =nvsI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9l24NVCWtSuIVIod--