From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Guenter Roeck Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] net: hisilicon: Never build on SPARC Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 11:16:52 -0800 Message-ID: <20151106191652.GA4046@roeck-us.net> References: <1445437773-23261-1-git-send-email-linux@roeck-us.net> <4129407.LpDXnpSZOL@wuerfel> <5627C549.9080600@roeck-us.net> <5243548.YbVhhU6W8t@wuerfel> <20151021215320.GB23371@roeck-us.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Arnd Bergmann Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151021215320.GB23371@roeck-us.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Arnd, On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 02:53:20PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 09:11:53PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Wednesday 21 October 2015 10:03:05 Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > > > > > > Something like this? > > > > > > > > static inline u64 of_translate_address(struct device_node *np, const __be32 *addr) > > > > { > > > > #if defined(CONFIG_SPARC) || defined(CONFIG_M68K) > > > > int pna = of_n_addr_cells(np); > > > > u64 ret = be32_to_cpu(addr[pna - 1]); > > > > > > > > if (pna > 1) > > > > ret += (u64)be32_to_cpu(addr[pna - 2]) << 32; > > > > > > > > return ret; > > > > > > That suggests that sparc would need a translation after all, which > > > seems to contradict what David said earlier. > > > > No, not a translation: the value is used without any offset that > > factors in the location of the bus, the above is just the shortest > > possible way to read the 64-bit number from a big-endian property > > of variable length. > > > Out of my realm .. David would have to comment on that. > > > > Anyway, if it gets that complicated, I think we should stick with > > > just returning OF_BAD_ADDR. The above really suggests the need for > > > an architecture specific solution. > > > > Probably no harm in this really: the far more common > > of_address_to_resource() and of_iomap() helpers are equally > > broken on SPARC and we just return a runtime error for those > > as well without CONFIG_OF_ADDRESS rather than breaking the build. > > > Agreed. Given this, returning OF_BAD_ADDR sounds like a better choice. > Arnd, do you know if a fix for this problem is pending in some branch ? Mainline sparc builds are now affected. Thanks, Guenter