Re: [PATCH 5/6] net: dsa: mv88e6060: add register defines header file

[Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>]

On Nov. Tuesday 10 (46) 03:30 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 09:25:51AM -0500, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> > Hi Neil,
> > 
> > On Nov. Tuesday 10 (46) 02:25 PM, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> > > To align with the mv88e6xxx code, add a similar header file
> > > with all the register defines.
> > > The file is based on the mv88e6xxx header for coherency.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
> > 
> > In the RFC patchset, Andrew mentioned that there is not that much things in
> > common with mv88e6xxx, so I don't really see a value to add a separate header
> > file. Would that make sense to you guys to add the defines directly in
> > mv88e6060.c and squash that in the last patch?
> 
> It is personal taste, but i think there are enough defines that having
> a separate header file is useful. For < 10 i would agree with Vivien,
> but with ~100, i prefer a header file. 

OK. So please fix the copyright owner of this new file then and we're good :-)

Thanks,
-v