From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: dns_resolver: convert time_t to time64_t Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 16:30:15 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <20151118.163015.168193621097563379.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20151118063643.GA16239@waves> <20151118.152025.1846834961092956563.davem@davemloft.net> <4702816.H75zDcB06x@wuerfel> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: mahfouz.saif.elyazal@gmail.com, dhowells@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: arnd@arndb.de Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4702816.H75zDcB06x@wuerfel> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 22:08:54 +0100 > On Wednesday 18 November 2015 15:20:25 David Miller wrote: >> From: Aya Mahfouz >> Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 08:36:44 +0200 >> >> > Changes the definition of the pointer _expiry from time_t to >> > time64_t. This is to handle the Y2038 problem where time_t >> > will overflow in the year 2038. The change is safe because >> > the kernel subsystems that call dns_query pass NULL. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann >> > Signed-off-by: Aya Mahfouz >> > --- >> > Changelog: >> > v1: The changes were originally made by Arnd Bergmann in >> > relation to time_t. I've broken down a patch sent to me >> > into two independent patches. >> >> Want me to apply this to 'net'? > > Yes, I think that would be good. The original patch was touching > both the key and net subsystems, but this patch makes sense by itself > now, and it helps keep the other half isolated to the key code. OK, it sounds like we can simply delete the argument if nobody in-tree uses it. But whatever... applied thanks.