From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org,
Grant Grundler <grundler@parisc-linux.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: tulip: turn compile-time warning into dev_warn()
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 12:26:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151119122610.GF22786@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9720627.53btSdPcQU@wuerfel>
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 11:42:26AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The tulip driver causes annoying build-time warnings for allmodconfig
> builds for all recent architectures:
>
> dec/tulip/winbond-840.c:910:2: warning: #warning Processor architecture undefined
> dec/tulip/tulip_core.c:101:2: warning: #warning Processor architecture undefined!
>
> This is the last remaining warning for arm64, and I'd like to get rid of
> it. We don't really know the cache line size, architecturally it would
> be at least 16 bytes, but all implementations I found have 64 or 128
> bytes. Configuring tulip for 32-byte lines as we do on ARM32 seems to
> be the safe but slow default, and nobody who cares about performance these
> days would use a tulip chip anyway, so we can just use that.
>
> To save the next person the job of trying to find out what this is for
> and picking a default for their architecture just to kill off the warning,
> I'm now removing the preprocessor #warning and turning it into a pr_warn
> or dev_warn that prints the equivalent information when the driver gets
> loaded.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/dec/tulip/tulip_core.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/dec/tulip/tulip_core.c
> index ed41559bae77..b553409e04ad 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/dec/tulip/tulip_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/dec/tulip/tulip_core.c
> @@ -98,8 +98,7 @@ static int csr0 = 0x01A00000 | 0x4800;
> #elif defined(__mips__)
> static int csr0 = 0x00200000 | 0x4000;
> #else
> -#warning Processor architecture undefined!
> -static int csr0 = 0x00A00000 | 0x4800;
> +static int csr0;
> #endif
>
> /* Operational parameters that usually are not changed. */
> @@ -1982,6 +1981,12 @@ static int __init tulip_init (void)
> pr_info("%s", version);
> #endif
>
> + if (!csr0) {
> + pr_warn("tulip: unknown CPU architecture, using default csr0\n");
> + /* default to 8 longword cache line alignment */
> + csr0 = 0x00A00000 | 0x4800;
Maybe print "defaulting to 8 longword cache line alignment" instead of
"default csr0"?
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/dec/tulip/winbond-840.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/dec/tulip/winbond-840.c
> index 9beb3d34d4ba..3c0e4d5c5fef 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/dec/tulip/winbond-840.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/dec/tulip/winbond-840.c
> @@ -907,7 +907,7 @@ static void init_registers(struct net_device *dev)
> #elif defined(CONFIG_SPARC) || defined (CONFIG_PARISC) || defined(CONFIG_ARM)
> i |= 0x4800;
> #else
> -#warning Processor architecture undefined
> + dev_warn(&dev->dev, "unknown CPU architecture, using default csr0 setting\n");
> i |= 0x4800;
Then we could print the default csr0 value here.
But, to be honest, this patch fixes a #warning on arm64 for a driver that
I never expect to be used. So whatever you do to silence it:
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
/me waits for on-soc tulip integration.
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-19 12:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-19 10:42 [PATCH] net: tulip: turn compile-time warning into dev_warn() Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-19 12:26 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2015-11-19 20:29 ` Florian Fainelli
2015-11-19 21:57 ` Grant Grundler
2015-11-19 23:50 ` Francois Romieu
2015-11-20 1:41 ` Grant Grundler
2015-11-19 21:37 ` Grant Grundler
2015-11-20 16:03 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151119122610.GF22786@arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=grundler@parisc-linux.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).