From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jiri Pirko Subject: Re: [patch net-next v2 4/6] mlxsw: core: Implement temperature hwmon interface Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 09:19:31 +0100 Message-ID: <20151203081931.GA2331@nanopsycho.orion> References: <20151202222551.GP2355@nanopsycho.orion> <20151202.172847.1855287186918935450.davem@davemloft.net> <20151202223531.GQ2355@nanopsycho.orion> <20151202.183758.91764299340813651.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: gerlitz.or@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f54.google.com ([74.125.82.54]:33788 "EHLO mail-wm0-f54.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756694AbbLCITe (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Dec 2015 03:19:34 -0500 Received: by wmec201 with SMTP id c201so14683645wme.0 for ; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 00:19:33 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151202.183758.91764299340813651.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 12:37:58AM CET, davem@davemloft.net wrote: >From: Jiri Pirko >Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 23:35:31 +0100 > >> Why to continue to work if we know that we are making things wrong >> (incorrect structure initialization in this case) ? What am I missing? > >The user might be able to continue to have connectivity and >report the problem. > >BUG_ON() is really a hard hammer. Okay.