From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
To: Per Hurtig <per.hurtig@kau.se>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, ncardwell@google.com,
nanditad@google.com, tom@herbertland.com, ycheng@google.com,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, fw@strlen.de, daniel@iogearbox.net,
willemb@google.com, ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi,
pasi.sarolahti@iki.fi, stephen@networkplumber.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, anna.brunstrom@kau.se,
apetlund@simula.no, michawe@ifi.uio.no,
mohammad.rajiullah@kau.se
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 1/2] tcp: RTO Restart (RTOR)
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 14:46:23 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151207164623.GA22976@mrl.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4719073d7d8285006b2fe5f1b67a3fe5255c503e.1449478261.git.per.hurtig@kau.se>
On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 10:00:11AM +0100, Per Hurtig wrote:
> This patch implements the RTO restart modification (RTOR). When data is
> ACKed, and the RTO timer is restarted, the time elapsed since the last
> outstanding segment was transmitted is subtracted from the calculated RTO
> value. This way, the RTO timer will expire after exactly RTO seconds, and
> not RTO + RTT [+ delACK] seconds.
>
> This patch also implements a new sysctl (tcp_timer_restart) that is used
> to control the timer restart behavior.
>
> Signed-off-by: Per Hurtig <per.hurtig@kau.se>
> ---
> Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.txt | 12 ++++++++++++
> include/net/tcp.h | 4 ++++
> net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c | 10 ++++++++++
> net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 50 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.txt b/Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.txt
> index 2ea4c45..4094128 100644
> --- a/Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.txt
(snip)
> @@ -2997,6 +2998,18 @@ static void tcp_cong_avoid(struct sock *sk, u32 ack, u32 acked)
> tcp_sk(sk)->snd_cwnd_stamp = tcp_time_stamp;
> }
>
> +static u32 tcp_unsent_pkts(const struct sock *sk)
> +{
> + struct sk_buff *skb = tcp_send_head(sk);
> + u32 pkts = 0;
> +
> + if (skb)
> + tcp_for_write_queue_from(skb, sk)
> + pkts += tcp_skb_pcount(skb);
> +
> + return pkts;
> +}
> +
> /* Restart timer after forward progress on connection.
> * RFC2988 recommends to restart timer to now+rto.
> */
> @@ -3027,6 +3040,17 @@ void tcp_rearm_rto(struct sock *sk)
> */
> if (delta > 0)
> rto = delta;
> + } else if (icsk->icsk_pending == ICSK_TIME_RETRANS &&
> + (sysctl_tcp_timer_restart == 1 ||
> + sysctl_tcp_timer_restart == 3) &&
> + (tp->packets_out + tcp_unsent_pkts(sk) <
> + TCP_RTORESTART_THRESH)) {
(snip)
By when this gets hit, you could have a big write queue.
What about wrapping at least this this condition
tp->packets_out + tcp_unsent_pkts(sk) < TCP_RTORESTART_THRESH
in its own check function? Like:
+static bool tcp_can_rtor(const struct sock *sk)
+{
+ struct sk_buff *skb = tcp_send_head(sk);
+ s32 target = TCP_RTORESTART_THRESH - tp->packets_out;
+
+ if (target <= 0)
+ return false;
+
+ if (skb) {
+ tcp_for_write_queue_from(skb, sk) {
+ target -= tcp_skb_pcount(skb);
+ if (target <= 0)
+ return false;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return true;
+}
This way it will only traverse what is needed for the check itself.
Marcelo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-07 16:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-07 9:00 [RFC PATCH net-next 0/2] tcp: timer restart for tail loss Per Hurtig
2015-12-07 9:00 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 1/2] tcp: RTO Restart (RTOR) Per Hurtig
2015-12-07 10:22 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2015-12-07 16:46 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner [this message]
2015-12-07 17:03 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-12-08 2:05 ` Yuchung Cheng
2015-12-08 9:25 ` Per Hurtig
2015-12-07 9:00 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 2/2] tcp: TLP restart (TLPR) Per Hurtig
2015-12-08 9:19 ` [RFC PATCHv2 net-next 0/2] tcp: timer restart for tail loss Per Hurtig
2015-12-08 9:19 ` [RFC PATCHv2 net-next 1/2] tcp: RTO Restart (RTOR) Per Hurtig
2015-12-08 10:50 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2015-12-08 11:03 ` Per Hurtig
2015-12-08 13:47 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-12-10 6:51 ` Per Hurtig
2015-12-10 15:37 ` Neal Cardwell
2015-12-10 21:11 ` Per Hurtig
2015-12-08 9:19 ` [RFC PATCHv2 net-next 2/2] tcp: TLP restart (TLPR) Per Hurtig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151207164623.GA22976@mrl.redhat.com \
--to=marcelo.leitner@gmail.com \
--cc=anna.brunstrom@kau.se \
--cc=apetlund@simula.no \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi \
--cc=michawe@ifi.uio.no \
--cc=mohammad.rajiullah@kau.se \
--cc=nanditad@google.com \
--cc=ncardwell@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pasi.sarolahti@iki.fi \
--cc=per.hurtig@kau.se \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=tom@herbertland.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
--cc=ycheng@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).