From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/2] xfrm: add rcu grace period in
 xfrm_policy_destroy()
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 13:34:22 +0100
Message-ID: <20151210123422.GA29565@gauss.secunet.com>
References: <1449588122-13941-1-git-send-email-edumazet@google.com>
 <20151208.225829.122422778076120961.davem@davemloft.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: <edumazet@google.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from a.mx.secunet.com ([195.81.216.161]:40889 "EHLO a.mx.secunet.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1753210AbbLJMe3 (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 10 Dec 2015 07:34:29 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20151208.225829.122422778076120961.davem@davemloft.net>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 10:58:29PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> Date: Tue,  8 Dec 2015 07:22:01 -0800
> 
> > We will soon switch sk->sk_policy[] to RCU protection,
> > as SYNACK packets are sent while listener socket is not locked.
> > 
> > This patch simply adds RCU grace period before struct xfrm_policy
> > freeing, and the corresponding rcu_head in struct xfrm_policy.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> 
> I'll give Steffen an opportunity to review these two patches.

Looks ok and survived some tests with socket policies.

If you want to take these direct into the net tree:

Acked-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>