From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2 v2 3/3] lwtunnel: implement support for ip6 encap Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 17:30:40 -0800 Message-ID: <20151217173040.318924d1@xeon-e3> References: <25335db6a83c31df4a13bfff8dfc4c359f8f1ef9.1450267709.git.pabeni@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Roopa Prabhu , Jiri Benc To: Paolo Abeni Return-path: Received: from mail-pf0-f171.google.com ([209.85.192.171]:34543 "EHLO mail-pf0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932384AbbLRBae (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Dec 2015 20:30:34 -0500 Received: by mail-pf0-f171.google.com with SMTP id 68so39865711pfc.1 for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 17:30:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <25335db6a83c31df4a13bfff8dfc4c359f8f1ef9.1450267709.git.pabeni@redhat.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 13:22:28 +0100 Paolo Abeni wrote: > Currently ip6 encap support for lwtunnel is missing. > This patch implement it, mostly duplicating the ipv4 parts. > > Also be sure to insert a space after the encap type, when > showing lwtunnel, to avoid the tunnel type and the following > argument being merged into a single word. > > Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni Patch does not apply cleanly. Probably because of recent changes to lwtunnel and tunnel related arguement parsing.