From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/5] sctp: add the rhashtable apis for sctp global transport hashtable Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 12:50:46 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <20151230.125046.310343849422003518.davem@davemloft.net> References: <2c413161eb3a2c74453bd8dc11815af7e237515e.1451490447.git.lucien.xin@gmail.com> <1451494651.8255.22.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: lucien.xin@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, mleitner@redhat.com, vyasevic@redhat.com, daniel@iogearbox.net To: eric.dumazet@gmail.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:38418 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754731AbbL3Rus (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Dec 2015 12:50:48 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1451494651.8255.22.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Eric Dumazet Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 11:57:31 -0500 > I am against using rhashtable in SCTP (or TCP) at this stage, given the > number of bugs we have with it. Come on Eric, we've largely dealt with all of these problems. I haven't seen a serious report in a while.