From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@redhat.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] skb corruption and kernel panic at forwarding with fragmentation
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 23:03:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160106220334.GA23789@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160106210532.GE27290@indiana.gru.redhat.com>
Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 11:11:41PM +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 10:59 PM, Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> Looks like this happens because ip_options_fragment() relies on
> > >> correct ip options length in ip control block in skb. But in
> > >> ip_finish_output_gso() control block in segments is reused by
> > >> skb_gso_segment(). following ip_fragment() sees some garbage.
> > >>
> > >> In my case there was no ip options but length becomes non-zero and
> > >> ip_options_fragment() picked some bytes from payload and decides to
> > >> fill huge range with IPOPT_NOOP (1). One of that ones flipped nr_frags
> > >> in skb_shared_info at the end of data =)
> > >>
> > >
> > > Hmm, it looks like SKB_GSO_CB should be cleared after skb_gso_segment()
> > > since all the gso information should be saved in shared_info after it finishes.
> > >
> > > Does a memset(0) on SKB_GSO_CB after skb_gso_segment() work as well?
> >
> > This will break present logic around ip_options_fragment() - it clears
> > options from
> > second and following fragments. With zeroed cb it will do nothing.
> >
> > ip_options_fragment() can get required information directly from ip header but
> > it also resets fields in IPCB -- probably it should stay valid here
> > and somebody else will use it later.
[..]
> I have hit this as well, this fixes it for me on an older kernel. Can you try it
> on latest kernel?
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_output.c b/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
> index d8a1745..f44bc91 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
> @@ -216,6 +216,7 @@ static int ip_finish_output_gso(struct sk_buff *skb)
> netdev_features_t features;
> struct sk_buff *segs;
> int ret = 0;
> + struct inet_skb_parm ipcb;
>
> if (skb_gso_network_seglen(skb) <= ip_skb_dst_mtu(skb))
> return ip_finish_output2(skb);
> @@ -227,6 +228,10 @@ static int ip_finish_output_gso(struct sk_buff *skb)
> * 2) skb arrived via virtio-net, we thus get TSO/GSO skbs directly
> * from host network stack.
> */
> + /* We need to save IPCB here because skb_gso_segment will use
> + * SKB_GSO_CB.
> + */
> + ipcb = *IPCB(skb);
> features = netif_skb_features(skb);
> segs = skb_gso_segment(skb, features & ~NETIF_F_GSO_MASK);
> if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(segs)) {
> @@ -241,6 +246,7 @@ static int ip_finish_output_gso(struct sk_buff *skb)
> int err;
>
> segs->next = NULL;
> + *IPCB(segs) = ipcb;
> err = ip_fragment(segs, ip_finish_output2);
>
> if (err && ret == 0)
I'm worried that this doesn't solve all cases. f.e. xfrm may also
call skb_gso_segment(), and it will call into ipv4/ipv6 netfilter
postrouting + ipv4 output functions...
nfqnl_enqueue_packet() is also affected.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-06 22:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-06 19:15 [BUG] skb corruption and kernel panic at forwarding with fragmentation Konstantin Khlebnikov
2016-01-06 19:59 ` Cong Wang
2016-01-06 20:11 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2016-01-06 21:05 ` Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
2016-01-06 22:03 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2016-01-06 23:49 ` Florian Westphal
2016-01-07 11:00 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2016-01-07 11:38 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2016-01-07 11:59 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-01-07 12:04 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2016-01-07 12:54 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-01-07 19:35 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2016-01-07 19:47 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-01-07 12:03 ` Florian Westphal
2016-01-07 18:43 ` [PATCH] net: prevent corruption of skb when using skb_gso_segment Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
2016-01-07 19:31 ` Florian Westphal
2016-01-07 21:16 ` [PATCH v2] " Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160106220334.GA23789@breakpoint.cc \
--to=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=cascardo@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=koct9i@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).