From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard Cochran Subject: Re: [RFC v5 1/6] Timekeeping cross timestamp interface for device drivers Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 10:13:54 +0100 Message-ID: <20160108091354.GB2344@localhost.localdomain> References: <1451911523-8534-1-git-send-email-christopher.s.hall@intel.com> <1451911523-8534-2-git-send-email-christopher.s.hall@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Christopher Hall , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Jeff Kirsher , "x86@kernel.org" , lkml , intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, "Stanton, Kevin B" To: John Stultz Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 05:05:24PM -0800, John Stultz wrote: > Yea. I just feel like lots of structures add extra abstraction that > makes the code harder to learn or re-learn. Not only is one trying to > remember the base types that are being passed around, but you also > have to remember what all the meta-structures are for. Especially for > these two-value structures. FWIW, I had exactly this trouble when reading this series. Thanks, Richard