From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/10] Proposal for a API set for HW Buffer
 management
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 14:53:54 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <20160113.145354.1680040047047045639.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <1452625834-22166-1-git-send-email-gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
 <20160112.155224.1322028826893670746.davem@davemloft.net>
 <87pox5wfd5.fsf@free-electrons.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com, andrew@lunn.ch, f.fainelli@gmail.com,
 linux@arm.linux.org.uk, jason@lakedaemon.net, arnd@arndb.de,
 boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
 simon.guinot@sequanux.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nadavh@marvell.com,
 alior@marvell.com, ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com,
 maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com, mw@semihalf.com, w@1wt.eu,
 linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com
To: gregory.clement@free-electrons.com
Return-path: <linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org>
In-Reply-To: <87pox5wfd5.fsf@free-electrons.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/options/linux-arm-kernel>,
 <mailto:linux-arm-kernel-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-arm-kernel-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel>,
 <mailto:linux-arm-kernel-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" <linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.infradead.org>
Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

From: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 18:36:54 +0100

> I perfectly understand that you are busy during this merge
> window. However, I didn't expect a feedback from you but more from the
> others who were involved previously on this topic.

When a patch is submitted with "net-next" in the Subject line and
no "RFC" or other indication like that, it means you think the
patch is ready for me to consider applying to my tree.

You have to communicate properly in your Subject line tags if you
want me to interpret your changes one way or another.

And quite frankly, I really don't even want to see a lot of RFC
networking changes posted when the merge window is open, I only want
to see bug fixes and people concentrating on that instead of future
work.

Thanks.