From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: hns: bug fix about hisilicon TSO BD mode Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 11:55:24 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <20160118.115524.1656097226798937868.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1453109056-161865-1-git-send-email-huangdaode@hisilicon.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: yisen.zhuang@huawei.com, yankejian@huawei.com, liguozhu@hisilicon.com, salil.mehta@huawei.com, geliangtang@163.com, lipeng321@huawei.com, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kenneth-Lee-2012@foxmail.com To: huangdaode@hisilicon.com Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1453109056-161865-1-git-send-email-huangdaode@hisilicon.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: Daode Huang Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 17:24:16 +0800 > The current upstreaming code fails to set the tso_mode register > when initilizes, when processes large size packets, the default 4 bd is > not enough, so this patch initilizes it and set the default value to 8 bds > > Signed-off-by: Daode Huang Your insistance of continually using "net-next" in your subject lines shows you have no idea what GIT trees are active and in what trees development and bug fixing is actually occurring in. The 'net' tree is the only tree active now and your driver has been in there for over a week. And this is the place where all appropriate bug fixes go. Therefore if your code is present in the 'net' tree and you are fixing things in that codebase, then that is the tree you target. I've been silently applying your patches there instead of net-next, but I'm not going to do it any more and I will just reject patches not submitted properly from this point forward. Thanks.