From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner Subject: Re: [PATCH net] sctp: fix rcu usage on proc listing Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 23:07:20 -0200 Message-ID: <20160120010720.GA22183@mrl.redhat.com> References: <20160119220230.GA15926@mrl.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Vlad Yasevich , Neil Horman , Xin Long , linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:60701 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932748AbcATBHY (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jan 2016 20:07:24 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160119220230.GA15926@mrl.redhat.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 08:02:30PM -0200, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > > --- a/net/sctp/proc.c > > +++ b/net/sctp/proc.c > > @@ -491,6 +491,7 @@ static int sctp_remaddr_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v) > > tsp = (struct sctp_transport *)v; > > assoc = tsp->asoc; > > > > + rcu_read_lock(); should have used rcu_read_lock_bh() here, will send a v2 tomorrow. > > list_for_each_entry_rcu(tsp, &assoc->peer.transport_addr_list, > > transports) { > > if (tsp->dead) > > @@ -543,6 +544,7 @@ static int sctp_remaddr_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v) > > > > seq_printf(seq, "\n"); > > } > > + rcu_read_unlock(); > > > > return 0; > > } > > -- > > 2.5.0 > > >