From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marek Vasut Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 5/5] net: can: ifi: Add IFI CANFD IP support Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 13:58:04 +0100 Message-ID: <201601201358.04790.marex@denx.de> References: <1452538083-7331-5-git-send-email-marex@denx.de> <569F63C4.4070708@pengutronix.de> <569F675D.1070903@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Oliver Hartkopp , Mark Rutland , Wolfgang Grandegger To: "Marc Kleine-Budde" Return-path: Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.9]:49873 "EHLO mail-out.m-online.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932347AbcATM6I (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jan 2016 07:58:08 -0500 In-Reply-To: <569F675D.1070903@pengutronix.de> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wednesday, January 20, 2016 at 11:54:21 AM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: > On 01/20/2016 11:39 AM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: > >> +/* IFI CANFD private data structure */ > >> +struct ifi_canfd_priv { > >> + struct can_priv can; /* must be the first member */ > >> + struct napi_struct napi; > >> + struct net_device *ndev; > >> + struct device *device; > > > > Nitpick: This variable is write only, correct? I can fix this while > > applying the patch. > > > >> + void __iomem *base; > >> +}; > > > > Otherweise looks good. It's write-only, yeah. What would you propose to change here ? > Until compiling: > > drivers/net/can/ifi_canfd/ifi_canfd.c:486:40: warning: cast truncates > > bits from constant value (ffffffff7ffffffd becomes 7ffffffd) > > drivers/net/can/ifi_canfd/ifi_canfd.c:640:9: warning: cast truncates > > bits from constant value (ffffffff7fffffff becomes 7fffffff) > > drivers/net/can/ifi_canfd/ifi_canfd.c:676:9: warning: cast truncates > > bits from constant value (ffffffff7fffffff becomes 7fffffff) > > target is ARMv5 with gcc version 4.9.2, compiled with C=2 using sparse > v0.5.0. It's again the BIT() macro :-/ Do you have any idea how to fix this please ? Doing something like u32 foo = ~BIT(31); triggers this splat and I am running out of ideas how to fix that. Best regards, Marek Vasut