From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] ipv4: add option to drop unicast encapsulated in L2 multicast Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 16:16:57 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20160128.161657.1850505368474577536.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1446712923-9136-1-git-send-email-johannes@sipsolutions.net> <1453984413.2217.13.camel@sipsolutions.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ja-FgGsKACvmQM@public.gmane.org, linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1453984413.2217.13.camel-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-wireless-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: Johannes Berg Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 13:33:33 +0100 > Is there anything I should do about these patches? > > I see you marked them as "deferred" in patchwork, but I don't really > know how you're using that state. I use it in two situations, the first is the most often used case but doesn't apply to this specific situation :-) 1) net-next change submitted while net-next is closed 2) discussion has ensued for several days, no resolution imminent And I think #2 is the case that happened here. You can submit them again to reignite the conversation if you like. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html