From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] ethtool: properly indent man sub-options
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 09:18:28 -0800
Message-ID: <20160128091828.0000497e@unknown>
References: <1452217843-18254-1-git-send-email-jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: <ben@decadent.org.uk>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <bwh@kernel.org>
To: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:64910 "EHLO mga09.intel.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1946071AbcA1RSa (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 28 Jan 2016 12:18:30 -0500
In-Reply-To: <1452217843-18254-1-git-send-email-jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

On Thu, 7 Jan 2016 17:50:43 -0800
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com> wrote:

> The ethtool.8 file was full of lots of incorrectly indented
> bits.  This fixes the arguments to options to be indented in
> a visually appealing way.

Hey Ben (ethtool maintainer), I never saw a response to this patch, do
I need to resend it?