From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ipv4: early demux should be aware of fragments Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 12:24:37 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20160129.122437.2258453843319826058.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1453856382.11327.49.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> <20160127.170203.701586924097928864.davem@davemloft.net> <1454080926.7627.49.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: joe@ovn.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, fw@strlen.de, hannes@stressinduktion.org, pshelar@ovn.org To: eric.dumazet@gmail.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:39525 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752830AbcA2UYi (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Jan 2016 15:24:38 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1454080926.7627.49.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Eric Dumazet Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 07:22:06 -0800 > On Wed, 2016-01-27 at 17:02 -0500, David Miller wrote: >> From: Eric Dumazet >> Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 16:59:42 -0800 >> >> > From: Eric Dumazet >> > >> > We should not assume a valid protocol header is present, >> > as this is not the case for IPv4 fragments. >> > >> > Lets avoid extra cache line misses and potential bugs >> > if we actually find a socket and incorrectly uses its dst. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet >> >> Applied, thanks. > > David, I do not see this patch in net tree ? This should be fixed now, thanks for letting me know.