From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH net V1 0/3] mlx5 driver fixes for 4.5-rc2 Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2016 13:44:40 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <20160207.134440.449917136946691623.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1454426781-7128-1-git-send-email-ogerlitz@mellanox.com> <56B76660.4050105@mellanox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, saeedm@mellanox.com, matanb@mellanox.com, eranbe@mellanox.com To: ogerlitz@mellanox.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:35445 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754186AbcBGSor (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Feb 2016 13:44:47 -0500 In-Reply-To: <56B76660.4050105@mellanox.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Or Gerlitz Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2016 17:44:32 +0200 > On 2/2/2016 5:26 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote: >> We added here a patch from Matan and Alaa for addressing Linus >> comments on >> the mess w.r.t reserved field names in the driver/firmware >> auto-generated file. >> >> Once the patch hits linus tree, we'll ask Doug to rebase his tree on >> that >> rc so both net-next and rdma-next development for 4.6 will be done >> under >> the fixed robust form. > > Hi Dave, > > We've identified few places in the auto generated file where the > naming conversion > of reserved fields was not fully applied. Since the patch only did > re-naming of > reserved fields which are not used for existing functionality, the > testing we did > under the modified header file didn't catch that... > > We'll respin the patch and series. Ok.