From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] net, thunderx: Use bool in structs where possible Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 15:06:31 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <20160218.150631.574392083739567663.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1455799149-19590-3-git-send-email-rrichter@caviumnetworks.com> <20160218.110514.652169911099659792.davem@davemloft.net> <20160218164217.GP24726@rric.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: sgoutham@cavium.com, rric@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: robert.richter@caviumnetworks.com Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20160218164217.GP24726@rric.localdomain> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: Robert Richter Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 17:42:17 +0100 > On 18.02.16 11:05:14, David Miller wrote: >> From: Robert Richter >> Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 13:39:09 +0100 >> >> > From: Robert Richter >> > >> > Looks like the :1 notation was accidentally introduced (this still >> > uses 1 byte per flag). Using bool instead, which is the common use. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Robert Richter >> >> Such cleanups are not appropriate for 'net'. Only real bug fixes should >> be targetted that. >> >> Respin these patches targetting the correct tree(s). > > Do you mean posting the two as "trivial" patches? No I mean posting #1 targetted at my 'net' GIT tree as a bug fix, and posting #2 targetted separately at my 'net-next' GIT tree as a cleanup. This is how we've been doing things for more than a decade.