From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH stable v2 1/1] net/ipv6: add sysctl option
 accept_ra_min_hop_limit
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 11:14:23 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <20160219.111423.805323521899765528.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <1454464576-17776-1-git-send-email-machida.yuki@jp.fujitsu.com>
	<56C6D736.20901@jp.fujitsu.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, hideaki.yoshifuji@miraclelinux.com,
	yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, liuhangbin@gmail.com
To: machida.yuki@jp.fujitsu.com
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:34206 "EHLO
	shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1427492AbcBSQOZ (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Fri, 19 Feb 2016 11:14:25 -0500
In-Reply-To: <56C6D736.20901@jp.fujitsu.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

From: Yuki Machida <machida.yuki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 17:49:58 +0900

> ping? thanks.

If your patch is properly queued in patchwork, you never need to do
pings on the mailing list like this.

Someone knows the patch need to be dealt with, and if it is not being
reviewed it simply means that other patches are other older or have
a much higher priority than your's.