From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [PATCH][net-next][v2] bridge: allow the maximum mtu to 64k Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 13:44:56 -0800 Message-ID: <20160224134456.3ea94f0a@xeon-e3> References: <1456189256-7811-1-git-send-email-roy.qing.li@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: roy.qing.li@gmail.com Return-path: Received: from mail-pf0-f181.google.com ([209.85.192.181]:35306 "EHLO mail-pf0-f181.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750779AbcBXVos (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Feb 2016 16:44:48 -0500 Received: by mail-pf0-f181.google.com with SMTP id c10so20644020pfc.2 for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 13:44:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1456189256-7811-1-git-send-email-roy.qing.li@gmail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 09:00:56 +0800 roy.qing.li@gmail.com wrote: > This is especially annoying for the virtualization case because the > KVM's tap driver will by default adopt the bridge's MTU on startup > making it impossible (without the workaround) to use a large MTU on the > guest VMs. > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1399064 This use case looks like KVM misusing bridge MTU. I.e it should set TAP MTU to what it wants then enslave it, not vice versa.