From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] RxRPC: Rewrite part 1 Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2016 18:27:14 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <20160304.182714.555842688027148255.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20160304.172010.571829527806753588.davem@davemloft.net> <20160304163705.31057.60831.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <6513.1457130818@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: dhowells@redhat.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:37206 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760494AbcCDX1S (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Mar 2016 18:27:18 -0500 In-Reply-To: <6513.1457130818@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: David Howells Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2016 22:33:38 +0000 > David Miller wrote: > >> Can you go through and use "unsigned int" instead of just plain >> "unsigned" in the RxRPC code? > > Do you mind if I leave it to after the rewrite? I don't particularly want to > have to rejig all the patches I have. Sure.