From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: dhowells@redhat.com
Cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] rxrpc: Add a common object cache
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2016 15:15:14 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160308.151514.2100824747766658409.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <30372.1457442148@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2016 13:02:28 +0000
> David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Does it make sense to maintain a FIFO list of connections (though this would
>> mean potentially taking a spinlock every time I get a packet)?
>
> It occurs to me that only inactive connections would need to be on an LRU
> list. Any connection with packets or active calls to deal with wouldn't be on
> the list.
In that kind of scheme you have to decide if it's possible to elide a
response in order to intentionally keep objects off the "inactive" LRU
list. I bet there is.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-08 20:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-07 14:37 [PATCH 00/11] RxRPC: Rewrite part 2 David Howells
2016-03-07 14:38 ` [PATCH 01/11] rxrpc: Add a common object cache David Howells
2016-03-07 18:42 ` David Miller
2016-03-07 22:45 ` David Howells
2016-03-08 4:07 ` David Miller
2016-03-08 11:39 ` David Howells
2016-03-08 20:13 ` David Miller
2016-03-08 21:11 ` David Howells
2016-03-09 3:00 ` David Miller
2016-03-08 13:02 ` David Howells
2016-03-08 20:15 ` David Miller [this message]
2016-03-07 14:38 ` [PATCH 02/11] rxrpc: Do procfs lists through objcache David Howells
2016-03-07 14:38 ` [PATCH 03/11] rxrpc: Separate local endpoint object handling out into its own file David Howells
2016-03-07 14:38 ` [PATCH 04/11] rxrpc: Implement local endpoint cache David Howells
2016-03-07 14:38 ` [PATCH 05/11] rxrpc: procfs file to list local endpoints David Howells
2016-03-07 14:38 ` [PATCH 06/11] rxrpc: Rename ar-local.c to local-event.c David Howells
2016-03-07 14:38 ` [PATCH 07/11] rxrpc: Rename ar-peer.c to peer-object.c David Howells
2016-03-07 14:38 ` [PATCH 08/11] rxrpc: Implement peer endpoint cache David Howells
2016-03-07 14:39 ` [PATCH 09/11] rxrpc: Add /proc/net/rxrpc_peers to display the known remote endpoints David Howells
2016-03-07 14:39 ` [PATCH 10/11] rxrpc: Rename ar-error.c to peer-event.c David Howells
2016-03-07 14:39 ` [PATCH 11/11] rxrpc: Rename rxrpc_UDP_error_report() to rxrpc_error_report() David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160308.151514.2100824747766658409.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).