From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] net: macb: Fix coding style issues Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2016 15:26:41 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <20160309.152641.1788526652068750778.davem@davemloft.net> References: <56E04F73.6030504@xilinx.com> <20160309.122210.1419008371671612631.davem@davemloft.net> <56E05D5D.80604@xilinx.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: nicolas.ferre@atmel.com, moritz.fischer@ettus.com, cyrille.pitchen@atmel.com, punnaia@xilinx.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: michal.simek@xilinx.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:33500 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753847AbcCIU0o convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Mar 2016 15:26:44 -0500 In-Reply-To: <56E05D5D.80604@xilinx.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: =46rom: Michal Simek Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 18:29:01 +0100 > On 9.3.2016 18:22, David Miller wrote: >> From: Michal Simek >> Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 17:29:39 +0100 >>=20 >>> On 7.3.2016 18:13, Nicolas Ferre wrote: >>>> Le 07/03/2016 17:17, Moritz Fischer a =E9crit : >>>>> Hi Nicolas, >>>>> >>>>> this series deals with most of the checkpatch warnings >>>>> generated for macb. There are two BUG_ON()'s that I didn't touch,= yet, >>>>> that were suggested by checkpatch, that I can address in a follow= up >>>>> commit if needed. >>>>> Let me know if you want me to split the fixes differently or squa= sh >>>>> them into one commit. >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I'm not usually fond of this type of patches, but I must admit tha= t this >>>> series corrects some style issues. >>>> >>>> So, I would like more feedback from Michal and Cyrille as these ch= anges >>>> may delay some of the not-merged-yet features or more important >>>> work-in-progress on their side. >>>> >>>> On the other hand, if we all think it's a calm period for this mac= b >>>> driver, we may find interesting to merge some "cleanup and style" >>>> enhancements. >>> >>> Not a problem with merging cleanups in general. We have several out= of >>> tree patches but doesn't make sense to to wait. >>> I wasn't in cc for the series but I don't like this change to be th= e >>> part of cleanup series. >>> >>> mac =3D of_get_mac_address(np); >>> if (mac) >>> - memcpy(bp->dev->dev_addr, mac, ETH_ALEN); >>> + ether_addr_copy(bp->dev->dev_addr, mac); >>=20 >> Why? This is what we tell people to use. >=20 > I would expect this as separate patch not the part of one huge cleanu= p > patch which does just comment and space cleanups. That is true.