From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [RFC] net: ipv4 -- Introduce ifa limit per net Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 17:36:30 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <20160310.173630.525547775491939864.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20160310.160521.1642655131932337300.davem@davemloft.net> <20160310211945.GD1989@uranus.lan> <20160310215959.GE1989@uranus.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, solar@openwall.com, vvs@virtuozzo.com, avagin@virtuozzo.com, xemul@virtuozzo.com, vdavydov@virtuozzo.com, khorenko@virtuozzo.com, pablo@netfilter.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: gorcunov@gmail.com Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20160310215959.GE1989@uranus.lan> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: Cyrill Gorcunov Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 00:59:59 +0300 > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 12:19:45AM +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: >> > >> > Oh yes they do, from masq's non-inet notifier. masq registers two >> > notifiers, one for generic netdev and one for inetdev. >> >> Thanks a huge David! I'll test it just to be sure. > > Works like a charm! So David, what are the next steps then? > Mind to gather all your patches into one (maybe)? I'll re-review all of the changes tomorrow and also look into ipv6 masq, to see if it needs the same treatment, as well. Thanks for all of your help and testing so far.