* [PATCH v2 net-next] ixgbe: Avoid unaligned access in ixgbe_atr() for LLC packets
@ 2016-03-14 17:46 Sowmini Varadhan
2016-03-14 17:55 ` Alexander Duyck
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sowmini Varadhan @ 2016-03-14 17:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-wired-lan, netdev
Cc: sowmini.varadhan, alexander.duyck, jeffrey.t.kirsher,
jesse.brandeburg, shannon.nelson, carolyn.wyborny,
donald.c.skidmore, bruce.w.allan, john.ronciak, mitch.a.williams
For LLC based protocols like lldp, stp etc., the ethernet header
is an 802.3 header with a h_proto that is not 0x800, 0x86dd, or
even 0x806. In this world, the skb_network_header() points at
the DSAP/SSAP/.. and is not likely to be NET_IP_ALIGNed in
ixgbe_atr().
With LLC, drivers are not likely to correctly find IPVERSION,
or "6", at hdr.ipv4->version, but will instead just needlessly
trigger an unaligned access. (IPv4/IPv6 over LLC is almost never
implemented).
The unaligned access is thus avoidable: bail out quickly after
examining first->protocol.
Signed-off-by: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@oracle.com>
---
v2: Alexander Duyck comments.
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c | 5 +++++
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
index 4d6223d..b25e603 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
@@ -7574,6 +7574,11 @@ static void ixgbe_atr(struct ixgbe_ring *ring,
if (!ring->atr_sample_rate)
return;
+ if (first->protocol != htons(ETH_P_IP) &&
+ first->protocol != htons(ETH_P_IPV6) &&
+ first->protocol != htons(ETH_P_ARP))
+ return;
+
ring->atr_count++;
/* snag network header to get L4 type and address */
--
1.7.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] ixgbe: Avoid unaligned access in ixgbe_atr() for LLC packets
2016-03-14 17:46 [PATCH v2 net-next] ixgbe: Avoid unaligned access in ixgbe_atr() for LLC packets Sowmini Varadhan
@ 2016-03-14 17:55 ` Alexander Duyck
2016-03-14 17:59 ` Sowmini Varadhan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Duyck @ 2016-03-14 17:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sowmini Varadhan
Cc: intel-wired-lan, Netdev, Jeff Kirsher, Brandeburg, Jesse,
shannon nelson, Carolyn Wyborny, Skidmore, Donald C,
Bruce W Allan, John Ronciak, Mitch Williams
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Sowmini Varadhan
<sowmini.varadhan@oracle.com> wrote:
>
> For LLC based protocols like lldp, stp etc., the ethernet header
> is an 802.3 header with a h_proto that is not 0x800, 0x86dd, or
> even 0x806. In this world, the skb_network_header() points at
> the DSAP/SSAP/.. and is not likely to be NET_IP_ALIGNed in
> ixgbe_atr().
>
> With LLC, drivers are not likely to correctly find IPVERSION,
> or "6", at hdr.ipv4->version, but will instead just needlessly
> trigger an unaligned access. (IPv4/IPv6 over LLC is almost never
> implemented).
>
> The unaligned access is thus avoidable: bail out quickly after
> examining first->protocol.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@oracle.com>
> ---
> v2: Alexander Duyck comments.
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c | 5 +++++
> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
> index 4d6223d..b25e603 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
> @@ -7574,6 +7574,11 @@ static void ixgbe_atr(struct ixgbe_ring *ring,
> if (!ring->atr_sample_rate)
> return;
>
> + if (first->protocol != htons(ETH_P_IP) &&
> + first->protocol != htons(ETH_P_IPV6) &&
> + first->protocol != htons(ETH_P_ARP))
> + return;
> +
One other thing I forgot to mention is that we don't support ARP so
that check could be dropped. The ATR code only supports IPv4 or IPv6
with TCP.
- Alex
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] ixgbe: Avoid unaligned access in ixgbe_atr() for LLC packets
2016-03-14 17:55 ` Alexander Duyck
@ 2016-03-14 17:59 ` Sowmini Varadhan
2016-03-14 19:20 ` Alexander Duyck
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sowmini Varadhan @ 2016-03-14 17:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexander Duyck
Cc: intel-wired-lan, Netdev, Jeff Kirsher, Brandeburg, Jesse,
shannon nelson, Carolyn Wyborny, Skidmore, Donald C,
Bruce W Allan, John Ronciak, Mitch Williams
On (03/14/16 10:55), Alexander Duyck wrote:
>
> One other thing I forgot to mention is that we don't support ARP so
> that check could be dropped. The ATR code only supports IPv4 or IPv6
> with TCP.
I did notice that, but I left it in place because (a) it comes down
the stack with the NET_IP_ALIGNment and (b) ARP is only sent over
Ethernet II (there is no LLC SAP for ARP, which is a big reason
why ipv4 is not sent over llc, despite rfc 1042).
I figured it would not hurt to pass it down, in case we decide
to do something clever with it in the future.
--Sowmini
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] ixgbe: Avoid unaligned access in ixgbe_atr() for LLC packets
2016-03-14 17:59 ` Sowmini Varadhan
@ 2016-03-14 19:20 ` Alexander Duyck
2016-03-14 19:32 ` Sowmini Varadhan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Duyck @ 2016-03-14 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sowmini Varadhan
Cc: intel-wired-lan, Netdev, Jeff Kirsher, Brandeburg, Jesse,
shannon nelson, Carolyn Wyborny, Skidmore, Donald C,
Bruce W Allan, John Ronciak, Mitch Williams
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Sowmini Varadhan
<sowmini.varadhan@oracle.com> wrote:
> On (03/14/16 10:55), Alexander Duyck wrote:
>>
>> One other thing I forgot to mention is that we don't support ARP so
>> that check could be dropped. The ATR code only supports IPv4 or IPv6
>> with TCP.
>
> I did notice that, but I left it in place because (a) it comes down
> the stack with the NET_IP_ALIGNment and (b) ARP is only sent over
> Ethernet II (there is no LLC SAP for ARP, which is a big reason
> why ipv4 is not sent over llc, despite rfc 1042).
>
> I figured it would not hurt to pass it down, in case we decide
> to do something clever with it in the future.
I figure it is better to just drop it since we don't need to be trying
to parse ARP packets anyway.
- Alex
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] ixgbe: Avoid unaligned access in ixgbe_atr() for LLC packets
2016-03-14 19:20 ` Alexander Duyck
@ 2016-03-14 19:32 ` Sowmini Varadhan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sowmini Varadhan @ 2016-03-14 19:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexander Duyck
Cc: intel-wired-lan, Netdev, Jeff Kirsher, Brandeburg, Jesse,
shannon nelson, Carolyn Wyborny, Skidmore, Donald C,
Bruce W Allan, John Ronciak, Mitch Williams
On (03/14/16 12:20), Alexander Duyck wrote:
> I figure it is better to just drop it since we don't need to be trying
> to parse ARP packets anyway.
Ok, let me send out v3.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-03-14 19:33 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-03-14 17:46 [PATCH v2 net-next] ixgbe: Avoid unaligned access in ixgbe_atr() for LLC packets Sowmini Varadhan
2016-03-14 17:55 ` Alexander Duyck
2016-03-14 17:59 ` Sowmini Varadhan
2016-03-14 19:20 ` Alexander Duyck
2016-03-14 19:32 ` Sowmini Varadhan
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).