From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: joe@perches.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 0/2] Create ancient subdirectories for old hardware
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 23:16:26 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160318.231626.670272515350508280.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1458354482.26915.35.camel@perches.com>
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 19:28:02 -0700
> On Fri, 2016-03-18 at 22:11 -0400, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
>> Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 17:33:29 -0700
>>
>> > Maybe something like this:
>> >
>> > Old, rare, and unsupported hardware should be exposed as ancient.
>> >
>> > The drivers for these ancient hardwares are generally untested with
>> > current kernels.
>>
>> Moving drivers has a long term maintainence cost.
>>
>> If they've moved into drivers/net proper, we have to maintain
>> them there forever.
>
> I don't doubt that.
>
> All files are still in drivers/net, just possibly in
> separate subdirectories for easier visibility to
> determine if changes like what were proposed for cxgb
> should actually be done or not.
You don't understand my concern, backporting patches to -stable
releases is more painful if you move the driver anywhere other
than where it has been for years.
I'm not entertaining this idea, sorry Joe.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-19 3:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-18 9:32 [PATCH] net: consolidate lock/unlock into unlock_wait Nicholas Mc Guire
2016-03-18 21:37 ` David Miller
2016-03-18 22:35 ` Joe Perches
2016-03-19 0:33 ` [RFC net-next 0/2] Create ancient subdirectories for old hardware Joe Perches
2016-03-19 0:33 ` [RFC net-next 1/2] drivers/net: Create an ANCIENT_NETDEVICES symbol Joe Perches
2016-03-19 0:33 ` [RFC net-next 2/2] chelsio: Move original cxgb driver into ancient subdirectory Joe Perches
2016-03-19 2:11 ` [RFC net-next 0/2] Create ancient subdirectories for old hardware David Miller
2016-03-19 2:28 ` Joe Perches
2016-03-19 3:16 ` David Miller [this message]
2016-03-19 15:36 ` Joe Perches
2016-03-19 7:24 ` [PATCH] net: consolidate lock/unlock into unlock_wait Nicholas Mc Guire
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160318.231626.670272515350508280.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).