From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Naveen N. Rao" Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] samples/bpf: Enable powerpc support Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 20:11:31 +0530 Message-ID: <20160401144131.GG17907@naverao1-tp.ibm.com> References: <922f95fb5d16686367a66d2d4bd176149a87e9ad.1459423412.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <28a3811d03f6e8f7dca989a4ade536bf9aa8c7ce.1459423412.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <56FD63F4.2010500@fb.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S . Miller" , Daniel Borkmann To: Alexei Starovoitov Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56FD63F4.2010500@fb.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On 2016/03/31 10:52AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > On 3/31/16 4:25 AM, Naveen N. Rao wrote: > ... > >+ > >+#ifdef __powerpc__ > >+#define BPF_KPROBE_READ_RET_IP(ip, ctx) { (ip) = (ctx)->link; } > >+#define BPF_KRETPROBE_READ_RET_IP(ip, ctx) BPF_KPROBE_READ_RET_IP(ip, ctx) > >+#else > >+#define BPF_KPROBE_READ_RET_IP(ip, ctx) \ > >+ bpf_probe_read(&(ip), sizeof(ip), (void *)PT_REGS_RET(ctx)) > >+#define BPF_KRETPROBE_READ_RET_IP(ip, ctx) \ > >+ bpf_probe_read(&(ip), sizeof(ip), \ > >+ (void *)(PT_REGS_FP(ctx) + sizeof(ip))) > > makes sense, but please use ({ }) gcc extension instead of {} and > open call to make sure that macro body is scoped. To be sure I understand this right, do you mean something like this? + +#ifdef __powerpc__ +#define BPF_KPROBE_READ_RET_IP(ip, ctx) ({ (ip) = (ctx)->link; }) +#define BPF_KRETPROBE_READ_RET_IP BPF_KPROBE_READ_RET_IP +#else +#define BPF_KPROBE_READ_RET_IP(ip, ctx) ({ \ + bpf_probe_read(&(ip), sizeof(ip), (void *)PT_REGS_RET(ctx)); }) +#define BPF_KRETPROBE_READ_RET_IP(ip, ctx) ({ \ + bpf_probe_read(&(ip), sizeof(ip), \ + (void *)(PT_REGS_FP(ctx) + sizeof(ip))); }) +#endif + Thanks, Naveen