From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V3 00/16] net: fec: cleanup and fixes Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 23:58:04 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <20160406.235804.2223760831702758803.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1459909562-22865-1-git-send-email-troy.kisky@boundarydevices.com> <20160406.172029.2094647648319882709.davem@davemloft.net> <5705B33D.7060808@boundarydevices.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, fugang.duan@nxp.com, lznuaa@gmail.com, fabio.estevam@nxp.com, l.stach@pengutronix.de, andrew@lunn.ch, tremyfr@gmail.com, gerg@uclinux.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, johannes@sipsolutions.net, stillcompiling@gmail.com, sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com, arnd@arndb.de To: troy.kisky@boundarydevices.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:47759 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751802AbcDGD6I (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Apr 2016 23:58:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: <5705B33D.7060808@boundarydevices.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Troy Kisky Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 18:09:17 -0700 > On 4/6/2016 2:20 PM, David Miller wrote: >> >> This is a way too large patch series. >> >> Please split it up into smaller, more logical, pieces. >> >> Thanks. >> > > If you apply the 1st 3 that have been acked, I'll be at 13. > > Would I then send the next 5 for V4, and when that is applied > send another V4 with the next 8 that have been already been acked? What other reasonable option is there? I can't think of any.