From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: brouer@redhat.com, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@dev.mellanox.co.il>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@mellanox.com>, Tal Alon <talal@mellanox.com>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@mellanox.com>,
Eran Ben Elisha <eranbe@mellanox.com>,
Achiad Shochat <achiad@mellanox.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V2 05/11] net/mlx5e: Support RX multi-packet WQE (Striding RQ)
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 18:25:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160419182532.423d3c05@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1460989033.10638.120.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
On Mon, 18 Apr 2016 07:17:13 -0700
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 16:05 +0300, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 3:48 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2016-04-17 at 17:29 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > >
> > >>
> > >> If really you need to allocate physically contiguous memory, have you
> > >> considered converting the order-5 pages into 32 order-0 ones ?
> > >
> > > Search for split_page() call sites for examples.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Thanks Eric, we are already evaluating split_page as we speak.
> >
> > We did look but could not find any specific alloc_pages API that
> > allocates many physically contiguous pages with order0 ! so we assume
> > it is ok to use split_page.
>
> Note: I have no idea of split_page() performance :
Maybe Mel knows? And maybe Mel have an opinion about if this is a good
or bad approach, e.g. will this approach stress the page allocator in a
bad way?
> Buddy page allocator has to aggregate pages into order-5, then we would
> undo the work, touching 32 cache lines.
>
> You might first benchmark a simple loop doing
>
> loop 10,000,000 times
> Order-5 allocation
> split into 32 order-0
> free 32 pages
>
>
> Another idea would be to have a way to control max number of order-5
> pages that a port would be using.
>
> Since driver always own a ref on a order-5 pages, idea would be to
> maintain a circular ring of up to XXX such pages, so that we can detect
> an abnormal use and fallback to order-0 immediately.
That is part of my idea with my page-pool proposal. In the page-pool I
want to have some watermark counter that can block/stop the OOM issue at
this RX ring level.
See slide 12 of presentation:
http://people.netfilter.org/hawk/presentations/MM-summit2016/generic_page_pool_mm_summit2016.pdf
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
Author of http://www.iptv-analyzer.org
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-19 16:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-17 21:31 [PATCH net-next V2 00/11] Mellanox 100G mlx5 driver receive path optimizations Saeed Mahameed
2016-04-17 21:31 ` [PATCH net-next V2 01/11] net/mlx5: Introduce device queue counters Saeed Mahameed
2016-04-17 21:31 ` [PATCH net-next V2 02/11] net/mlx5e: Allocate set of queue counters per netdev Saeed Mahameed
2016-04-17 21:31 ` [PATCH net-next V2 03/11] net/mlx5e: Use only close NUMA node for default RSS Saeed Mahameed
2016-04-17 21:31 ` [PATCH net-next V2 04/11] net/mlx5e: Use function pointers for RX data path handling Saeed Mahameed
2016-04-17 21:31 ` [PATCH net-next V2 05/11] net/mlx5e: Support RX multi-packet WQE (Striding RQ) Saeed Mahameed
2016-04-18 0:29 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-04-18 12:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-04-18 13:05 ` Saeed Mahameed
2016-04-18 14:17 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-04-19 16:25 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2016-04-19 17:39 ` Mel Gorman
2016-04-20 16:46 ` Saeed Mahameed
2016-04-19 18:30 ` Saeed Mahameed
2016-04-17 21:32 ` [PATCH net-next V2 06/11] net/mlx5e: Added ICO SQs Saeed Mahameed
2016-04-17 21:32 ` [PATCH net-next V2 07/11] net/mlx5e: Add fragmented memory support for RX multi packet WQE Saeed Mahameed
2016-04-17 21:32 ` [PATCH net-next V2 08/11] net/mlx5e: Use napi_alloc_skb for RX SKB allocations Saeed Mahameed
2016-04-17 21:32 ` [PATCH net-next V2 09/11] net/mlx5e: Remove redundant barrier Saeed Mahameed
2016-04-17 21:32 ` [PATCH net-next V2 10/11] net/mlx5e: Delay skb->data access Saeed Mahameed
2016-04-17 21:32 ` [PATCH net-next V2 11/11] net/mlx5e: Add ethtool counter for RX buffer allocation failures Saeed Mahameed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160419182532.423d3c05@redhat.com \
--to=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=achiad@mellanox.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eranbe@mellanox.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ogerlitz@mellanox.com \
--cc=saeedm@dev.mellanox.co.il \
--cc=saeedm@mellanox.com \
--cc=talal@mellanox.com \
--cc=tariqt@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).