From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sabrina Dubroca Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/5] macsec: add missing NULL check after kmalloc Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 22:25:21 +0200 Message-ID: <20160419202521.GA1297@bistromath.localdomain> References: <1625750535.15145234.1461087947312.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Hannes Frederic Sowa , Johannes Berg , Dan Carpenter To: Lance Richardson Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:36232 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754512AbcDSUZ0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Apr 2016 16:25:26 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1625750535.15145234.1461087947312.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: 2016-04-19, 13:45:47 -0400, Lance Richardson wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Sabrina Dubroca" > > To: netdev@vger.kernel.org > > Cc: "Hannes Frederic Sowa" , "Johannes Berg" , "Dan Carpenter" > > , "Sabrina Dubroca" > > Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2016 1:36:38 PM > > Subject: [PATCH net 1/5] macsec: add missing NULL check after kmalloc > > > > Fixes: c09440f7dcb3 ("macsec: introduce IEEE 802.1AE driver") > > Reported-by: Dan Carpenter > > Signed-off-by: Sabrina Dubroca > > Acked-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa > > --- > > drivers/net/macsec.c | 4 ++-- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/macsec.c b/drivers/net/macsec.c > > index 84d3e5ca8817..f691030ee3df 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/macsec.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/macsec.c > > @@ -1622,8 +1622,8 @@ static int macsec_add_rxsa(struct sk_buff *skb, struct > > genl_info *info) > > } > > > > rx_sa = kmalloc(sizeof(*rx_sa), GFP_KERNEL); > > - if (init_rx_sa(rx_sa, nla_data(tb_sa[MACSEC_SA_ATTR_KEY]), secy->key_len, > > - secy->icv_len)) { > > + if (!rx_sa || init_rx_sa(rx_sa, nla_data(tb_sa[MACSEC_SA_ATTR_KEY]), > > + secy->key_len, secy->icv_len)) { > > Doesn't this leak rx_sa if kmalloc() succeeds but init_rx_sa fails? Yeah, you're right. And there's the same code around init_tx_sa. I'll send v2 tomorrow with this and another fix. Thanks! > > rtnl_unlock(); > > return -ENOMEM; > > } > > -- > > 2.8.0 > > > > -- Sabrina