From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Graf Subject: Re: [PATCH net 3/3] gre: receive also TEB packets for lwtunnels Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2016 03:49:38 +0200 Message-ID: <20160423014938.GD32327@pox.localdomain> References: <017d8f2b1c00e8fdbdb92a5898b1b5f365b58d6d.1461346798.git.jbenc@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Pravin B Shelar , Simon Horman To: Jiri Benc Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f47.google.com ([74.125.82.47]:34968 "EHLO mail-wm0-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751633AbcDWBtl (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Apr 2016 21:49:41 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-f47.google.com with SMTP id e201so34245433wme.0 for ; Fri, 22 Apr 2016 18:49:40 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <017d8f2b1c00e8fdbdb92a5898b1b5f365b58d6d.1461346798.git.jbenc@redhat.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 04/22/16 at 07:44pm, Jiri Benc wrote: > For ipgre interfaces in collect metadata mode, receive also traffic with > encapsulated Ethernet headers. The lwtunnel users are supposed to sort this > out correctly. This allows to have mixed Ethernet + L3-only traffic on the > same lwtunnel interface. > > To keep backwards compatibility and prevent any surprises, gretap interfaces > have priority in receiving packets with Ethernet headers. I may be missing some context. Is anyone using this already or is this preparing the stage for another user? It's not clear to me from the commit message.