From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lars Ellenberg Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/8] netlink: align attributes when needed (patchset #3) Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 14:18:50 +0200 Message-ID: <20160426121850.GC20950@soda.linbit> References: <1461657978-13360-1-git-send-email-nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com> <20160426115427.GB20950@soda.linbit> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Nicolas Dichtel , netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org, sd-y1jBWg8GRStKuXlAQpz2QA@public.gmane.org, johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org, kvalo-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org, linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, jack-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, pshelar-l0M0P4e3n4LQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, dev-yBygre7rU0TnMu66kgdUjQ@public.gmane.org, jhs-jkUAjuhPggJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org, philipp.reisner-63ez5xqkn6DQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, drbd-dev-cunTk1MwBs8qoQakbn7OcQ@public.gmane.org Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160426115427.GB20950-w1SgEEioFePxa46PmUWvFg@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: drbd-dev-bounces-cunTk1MwBs8qoQakbn7OcQ@public.gmane.org Errors-To: drbd-dev-bounces-cunTk1MwBs8qoQakbn7OcQ@public.gmane.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 01:54:27PM +0200, Lars Ellenberg wrote: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 10:06:10AM +0200, Nicolas Dichtel wrote: > > > > This is the continuation (series #3) of the work done to align netlink > > attributes when these attributes contain some 64-bit fields. > > > > It's the last patchset from what I've seen. > > > > The last user of nla_put_u64() is block/drbd. This module does not use > > standard netlink API (see all the stuff in include/linux/genl_magic_struct.h > > and include/linux/genl_magic_func.h). I didn't modify it because it's seems > > hard to do it whithout testing and fully understanding the context > > Something like this should just work. > + * @attrtype: attribute type > + * @value: numeric value > + */ > +static inline int nla_put_u64_64bit_unspec(struct sk_buff *skb, int attrtype, > + u64 value) > +{ > + return nla_put_64bit(skb, attrtype, sizeof(u64), &value, NLA_UNSPEC); Ok, I confused attribute and policy type there for a sec. Anyways, 0 works just fine, all our nested attribute enums are != 0, because nla_parse skips type 0. Lars