From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/5] stmmac: dwmac-socfpga refactor+cleanup Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 16:53:07 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <20160428.165307.1616888254325852103.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1461705899-17015-1-git-send-email-manabian@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: marex@denx.de, dinguyen@opensource.altera.com, peppe.cavallaro@st.com, alexandre.torgue@st.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: manabian@gmail.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:42150 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753066AbcD1UxJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Apr 2016 16:53:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1461705899-17015-1-git-send-email-manabian@gmail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Joachim Eastwood Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 23:24:54 +0200 > Couple of heads-up here: > 1. This patch set depend on Marek's "Remove re-registration of > reset controller" patch [1] which is not in net-next yet. > Without that patch this set will not apply! > > 2. The first patch changes the prototype of a couple of > functions used in Alexandre's "add Ethernet glue logic for > stm32 chip" patch [2] and will cause build failures for > dwmac-stm32.c if not fixed up! > If Alexandre's patch set is applied first I will gladly > rebase my patch set to account for his driver as well. ... > Dave: Please let me know if you have any preferred way of > handling this. You could cherry pick the patch in #1 and add it to this patch set, in fact please respin this series that way. For #2 it'll get sorted based upon who gets applied first.