From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/5] bridge: per-vlan stats Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 16:12:08 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <20160429.161208.1214717753456694357.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1461858771-4732-1-git-send-email-nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com> <20160429.153326.652947047579122837.davem@davemloft.net> <5723BABD.4080005@cumulusnetworks.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, roopa@cumulusnetworks.com, stephen@networkplumber.org, jhs@mojatatu.com To: nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:55736 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752893AbcD2UMK (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Apr 2016 16:12:10 -0400 In-Reply-To: <5723BABD.4080005@cumulusnetworks.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Nikolay Aleksandrov Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 21:49:17 +0200 > Because that is not needed for the per-vlan stats to work, I did to > unify the paths and simplify the pvid code but I can easily drop it > and revert back to using the direct pvid id. The only fetch will be > the stats per-cpu pointer then. Would that be acceptable ? It would be a step in the right direction, for sure.