From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexander Aring Subject: Re: IPv6: proxy_ndp to a network range Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 10:39:08 +0200 Message-ID: <20160509083903.GA2462@omega> References: <31ff66eb-38bd-0186-9e81-0543f0558323@zytor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: "H. Peter Anvin" Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f53.google.com ([74.125.82.53]:37522 "EHLO mail-wm0-f53.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750910AbcEIIjP (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 May 2016 04:39:15 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-f53.google.com with SMTP id a17so173417225wme.0 for ; Mon, 09 May 2016 01:39:15 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <31ff66eb-38bd-0186-9e81-0543f0558323@zytor.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi, On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 01:06:51AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Hello, > > There currently doesn't seem to be any support for proxy_ndp of a whole > network mask, as IPv4 proxy_arp seems to permit. > > a) Am I actually correct in this, or am I just missing something important? > > b) Is there a technical reason for this, or is it just a limitation of the > current implementation? > So far I know you can do this with the ndppd [0] userspace tool which listen NS/NA messages and do the ip -6 neigh add proxy for you. - Alex [0] https://github.com/DanielAdolfsson/ndppd