netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: pabeni@redhat.com
Cc: eric.dumazet@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	edumazet@google.com, jiri@mellanox.com, daniel@iogearbox.net,
	ast@plumgrid.com, aduyck@mirantis.com, tom@herbertland.com,
	peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org, riel@redhat.com,
	hannes@stressinduktion.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] net: threadable napi poll loop
Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 16:45:38 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160510.164538.1375529074383780155.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1462911770.5333.11.camel@redhat.com>

From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 22:22:50 +0200

> On Tue, 2016-05-10 at 09:08 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> On Tue, 2016-05-10 at 18:03 +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote:
>> 
>> > If a single core host is under network flood, i.e. ksoftirqd is
>> > scheduled and it eventually (after processing ~640 packets) will let the
>> > user space process run. The latter will execute a syscall to receive a
>> > packet, which will have to disable/enable bh at least once and that will
>> > cause the processing of another ~640 packets. To receive a single packet
>> > in user space, the kernel has to process more than one thousand packets.
>> 
>> Looks you found the bug then. Have you tried to fix it ?
 ...
> The ksoftirq and the local_bh_enable() design are the root of the
> problem, they need to be touched/affected to solve it.

That's not what I read from your description, processing 640 packets
before going to ksoftirqd seems to the be the absolute root problem.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-05-10 20:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-10 14:11 [RFC PATCH 0/2] net: threadable napi poll loop Paolo Abeni
2016-05-10 14:11 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] net: implement threaded-able napi poll loop support Paolo Abeni
2016-05-10 14:11 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] net: add sysfs attribute to control napi threaded mode Paolo Abeni
2016-05-10 14:29 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] net: threadable napi poll loop Eric Dumazet
2016-05-10 15:51   ` David Miller
2016-05-10 16:03   ` Paolo Abeni
2016-05-10 16:08     ` Eric Dumazet
2016-05-10 20:22       ` Paolo Abeni
2016-05-10 20:45         ` David Miller [this message]
2016-05-10 20:50           ` Rik van Riel
2016-05-10 20:52             ` David Miller
2016-05-10 21:01               ` Rik van Riel
2016-05-10 20:46   ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2016-05-10 21:09     ` Eric Dumazet
2016-05-10 21:31       ` Eric Dumazet
2016-05-10 21:35         ` Rik van Riel
2016-05-10 21:53           ` Eric Dumazet
2016-05-10 22:02             ` Eric Dumazet
2016-05-10 22:44               ` Eric Dumazet
2016-05-10 22:02             ` Rik van Riel
2016-05-11 17:55             ` Eric Dumazet
2016-05-10 22:32       ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2016-05-10 22:51         ` Eric Dumazet
2016-05-11  6:55           ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-11 13:13             ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2016-05-11 14:40               ` Eric Dumazet
2016-05-11 15:01                 ` Rik van Riel
2016-05-11 15:50                 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-05-11 21:56             ` Eric Dumazet
2016-05-12 20:07               ` Paolo Abeni
2016-05-12 20:49                 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-05-12 20:58                   ` Paolo Abeni
2016-05-12 21:05                     ` Eric Dumazet
2016-05-13 16:50               ` Paolo Abeni
2016-05-13 17:03                 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-05-13 17:19                   ` Paolo Abeni
2016-05-13 17:36                     ` Eric Dumazet
2016-05-16 13:10                       ` Paolo Abeni
2016-05-16 13:38                         ` Eric Dumazet
2016-05-11  9:48           ` Paolo Abeni
2016-05-11 13:08             ` Eric Dumazet
2016-05-11 13:39               ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2016-05-11 13:47                 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2016-05-11 14:38               ` Paolo Abeni
2016-05-11 14:45                 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-05-11 22:47                   ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2016-05-10 15:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-05-10 20:41   ` Paolo Abeni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160510.164538.1375529074383780155.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=aduyck@mirantis.com \
    --cc=ast@plumgrid.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
    --cc=jiri@mellanox.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=tom@herbertland.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).