From: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com>
To: Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>
Cc: <davem@davemloft.net>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <kernel-team@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 06/13] ipv6: Fix nexthdr for reinjection
Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 23:23:04 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160512232304.437eb3bc@halley> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1462985253-2380625-7-git-send-email-tom@herbertland.com>
Hi Tom,
On Wed, 11 May 2016 09:47:26 -0700 Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com> wrote:
> In ip6_input_finish the protocol handle returns a value greater than
> zero the packet needs to be resubmitted using the returned protocol.
> The returned protocol is being ignored and each time through resubmit
> nexthdr is taken from an offest in the packet. This patch fixes that
> so that nexthdr is taken from return value of the protocol handler.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>
> ---
> net/ipv6/ip6_input.c | 9 ++++++---
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6_input.c b/net/ipv6/ip6_input.c
> index 6ed5601..2a0258a 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/ip6_input.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_input.c
> @@ -222,13 +222,14 @@ static int ip6_input_finish(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *sk
> */
>
> rcu_read_lock();
> -resubmit:
> +
> idev = ip6_dst_idev(skb_dst(skb));
> if (!pskb_pull(skb, skb_transport_offset(skb)))
> goto discard;
> nhoff = IP6CB(skb)->nhoff;
> nexthdr = skb_network_header(skb)[nhoff];
>
> +resubmit:
This has already been attempted in 0243508edd "ipv6: Fix protocol
resubmission" and reverted in 1b0ccfe54a.
It looks that in some genuine extension header handling cases of ipv6
(not related to encapsulation), the original resubmission code REALLY
requires one to re-read IP6CB(skb)->nhoff and refetch the nexthdr.
See ipv6_rthdr_rcv and ipv6_destopt_rcv for example:
Snip from ipv6_rthdr_rcv:
struct inet6_skb_parm *opt = IP6CB(skb);
opt->lastopt = opt->srcrt = skb_network_header_len(skb);
skb->transport_header += (hdr->hdrlen + 1) << 3;
opt->dst0 = opt->dst1;
opt->dst1 = 0;
opt->nhoff = (&hdr->nexthdr) - skb_network_header(skb);
return 1;
Snip from ipv6_destopt_rcv:
opt = IP6CB(skb);
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6_MIP6)
opt->nhoff = dstbuf;
#else
opt->nhoff = opt->dst1;
#endif
return 1;
I think there are two "resubmission" cases:
1. original ipv6 extension header handling, which seem to require
nexthdr re-read (after IP6CB(skb)->nhoff re-assigned), as seen above
2. encapsulation resubmission (e.g. fou)
One suggestion: we may identify the encapsulation case by returning the
negative of the proto number.
Another suggestion: we can take your approach, but execute the nexthdr
re-read within ipv6_rthdr_rcv and ipv6_destopt_rcv (and similar
inet6_protocol.handler functions).
Regards,
Shmulik
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-12 20:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-11 16:47 [PATCH net-next 00/13] ipv6: Enable GUEoIPv6 and more fixes for v6 tunneling Tom Herbert
2016-05-11 16:47 ` [PATCH net-next 01/13] gso: Remove arbitrary checks for unsupported GSO Tom Herbert
2016-05-11 16:47 ` [PATCH net-next 02/13] net: define gso types for IPx over IPv4 and IPv6 Tom Herbert
2016-05-11 16:47 ` [PATCH net-next 03/13] fou: Call setup_udp_tunnel_sock Tom Herbert
2016-05-11 16:47 ` [PATCH net-next 04/13] fou: Split out {fou,gue}_build_header Tom Herbert
2016-05-12 18:55 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2016-05-11 16:47 ` [PATCH net-next 05/13] fou: Add encap ops for IPv6 tunnels Tom Herbert
2016-05-12 19:26 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2016-05-11 16:47 ` [PATCH net-next 06/13] ipv6: Fix nexthdr for reinjection Tom Herbert
2016-05-12 20:23 ` Shmulik Ladkani [this message]
2016-05-12 21:45 ` Tom Herbert
2016-05-13 4:16 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2016-05-13 6:28 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2016-05-13 11:00 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2016-05-11 16:47 ` [PATCH net-next 07/13] ipv6: Change "final" protocol processing for encapsulation Tom Herbert
2016-05-13 6:51 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2016-05-11 16:47 ` [PATCH net-next 08/13] fou: Support IPv6 in fou Tom Herbert
2016-05-11 16:47 ` [PATCH net-next 09/13] ip6_tun: Add infrastructure for doing encapsulation Tom Herbert
2016-05-11 16:47 ` [PATCH net-next 10/13] ip6_gre: Add support for fou/gue encapsulation Tom Herbert
2016-05-11 16:47 ` [PATCH net-next 11/13] ip6_tunnel: " Tom Herbert
2016-05-11 16:47 ` [PATCH net-next 12/13] ip6ip6: Support for GSO/GRO Tom Herbert
2016-05-11 16:47 ` [PATCH net-next 13/13] ip4ip6: " Tom Herbert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160512232304.437eb3bc@halley \
--to=shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tom@herbertland.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).