netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	Network Development List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nf_conntrack: avoid kernel pointer value leak in slab name
Date: Sat, 14 May 2016 23:33:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160514213322.GD9763@1wt.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFx_PuzNC0riLEN7PUpVnvQg374ZqCYBV-Uw6Be-OA=DwQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 02:31:04PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> > -       net->ct.slabname = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "nf_conntrack_%p", net);
> > +       net->ct.slabname = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "nf_conntrack_%llu",
> > +                               (u64)atomic64_inc_return(&unique_id));
> 
> Oh well. I suspect this is going to cause a new warning on alpha and
> ia64 and possibly others.
> 
> "u64" is indeed "unsigned long long" on x86 and many other
> architectures, but on alpga and ia64 it's just "unsigned long".
> 
> So that case should have been to "long long". I detest how there isn't
> a "64-bit size" printf specifier.

Why simply not cast the atomic to (unsigned long long) instead of (u64)
so that %llu always matches ?

Willy

  reply	other threads:[~2016-05-14 21:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-14 18:24 [PATCH] nf_conntrack: avoid kernel pointer value leak in slab name Linus Torvalds
2016-05-14 18:46 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-05-14 19:16 ` David Miller
2016-05-14 21:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-05-14 21:33   ` Willy Tarreau [this message]
2016-05-14 22:21     ` Linus Torvalds
2016-05-15  5:22       ` Willy Tarreau
2016-05-15 18:05   ` Linus Torvalds

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160514213322.GD9763@1wt.eu \
    --to=w@1wt.eu \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).